REPORT. ISO/TR. First edition. Reference number . This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC. (International Standard Risk Management ISO Draft Review) ISO , the international standard for Risk Management – ‘Risk Management. Hi:bigwave: Does anybody have a copy of the draft working document ISO they could share with little me? ttfn Ben.
|Published (Last):||15 August 2007|
|PDF File Size:||19.35 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
ISO Risk Management Standard Draft available for comment.
A common theme found in the comments was the addition of concepts or examples specific to countries or industries. The changes in the revision only concern the notes to the definitions. Ultimately the decision was made to simplify the text and use other documents, such as ISO Guide 73 to provide additional information to those that need it.
In general the changes are in 31040 direction of a better wording and more complete oso of what the notes want to convey. We can expect that the new version of ISO will be published at the end of or early in In the committee commenting stages there was a strong desire to address the proliferation of terms, that could impair the ease of access to the standard or add to confusion across sectors for many users.
Don’t be the weak link. The final DIS text has not dramatically changed the version and all steps in the process have been kept. Although effects can also become risk sources, the way note 1 is phrased only leads to a short sighted view on what can be understood by effects.
Please do review and pass on your thoughts and opinions by clicking the box below. Our main challenge was to find a fair and sensible balance between supplementing the chapter with necessary concepts and not losing sight of all other users. The consequences are then the effects of uncertainty on the objectives related to the opportunity pursued. It should be noted that there was some convergence, from initially very different positions, from members of the technical committee, and in some cases National Mirror Committees, towards a shared vision of best practice in global risk management.
This view was formed at the Moscow meeting and stuck to while resolving the comments on the technical committee draft reviewed in Jordan. Initially it was agreed that only minimal changes would be made to the standard while the committee looked at the potential for more substantial revision. Below some of the changes to the version of ISO have been summarised and a few words on why the changes are being proposed:.
The draft of the standard for review and comment is now available on the BSI Draft Review system at https: The message TC would like to pass on to the reader of the DIS is to critically assess if the current draft provides the required guidance while still remaining relevant to all organizations, in all countries. The Commenting process provides a real opportunity for those with risk responsibilities to feedback to the committee on any issues or opportunities to improve the standard before it becomes a National and International standard.
It immediately shows what the intent of the revision is. There was considerable discussion on fundamental issues on the role of standards. It is important to keep in mind that we are not drafting an American or European standard, a public sector or financial services standard, but rather a generic international standard.
Before being sent to ISO the draft of the DIS was endorsed by the working group WG2 and reviewed by an editorial team who checked for typographic issues and consistency across the different sections.
From the comments made by the contributing experts it was clear that Annex A should be removed and instead the topic drft with separately through a New Work item proposal to address risk management maturity.
Because in my opinion, opportunities and threats are external risk sources in the same way as weaknesses and strengths are internal risk sources. More interpretations are possible, more definitions come into play and more options in the use of the standard are provided e.
The major task to accomplish is progress the revision of ISO Two of these, the disruption and supply chain risk standards, have failed to make the 3100 and have recently been officially dropped, but the legal risk standard ISO is now in development with the national standards bodies of China drafh the UK jointly leading the work.
However, pursuing opportunities without managing threats and weaknesses and not building on isl, can certainly bring about unexpected and unwanted consequences. Find out more About Us. The vision was to phrase a framework clause that provides guidance that is relevant for every possible user of the standard.
Internet of Things What does it mean?
Comparing ISO 31000 (2009) with the draft ISO 31000 (2017) – Part 2
The decision to review ISO was taken at in Chicago in and now, 4 years later, a drafy version of the proposed updates to the ISO document is available for users to see.
This DIS is at an extremely important stage and we recommend that you review it very carefully in the context and wider activities of your organisation. As this 3104 was followed by 29 definitions that fully defined risk management the ISO way.